SCUBA LAB FIN REVIEW
|
MANUFACTURER & MODELo:p> |
OVERALL |
OVERALL |
COURSE |
COURSE EFFICIENCY |
AVERAGE OF MAX. SUSTAINED SPEEDS |
|
Apollo Sports Bio Fin Pro |
3.3* |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
2.8 mph |
|
Atomic Aquatics Splitfin |
3.6 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
2.7 mph |
|
Genesis Scuba Blitz |
4.6 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.2 mph |
|
Oceanic Vortex V-6 |
4.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
2.8 mph |
|
Oceanic Vortex V-12 |
3.4 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
2.8 mph |
|
Scubapro Twin Jet (Black) |
3.4 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
3.0 mph |
|
Scubapro Twin Jet (Colors) |
3.4 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
2.7 mph |
|
Sherwood Scuba Trek |
3.7 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
2.3 mph |
|
Tusa XPERT Zoom |
3.7 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
2.5 mph |
|
Mares Volo (best-ever paddle fin) |
4.4 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
2.1
mph |
* Apollo Bio Fin Pro - Best overall tested fin ever! Scuba Lab
|
FIN
PERFORMANCE SCORING |
|
1 =
Outstanding |
|
2 = Good to
Excellent |
|
3 =
Adequate |
|
4 =
Marginal |
|
5 =
Unacceptable |
SCUBALAB REVIEW
Fin Manufactures make
all kinds of claims about the underwater swimming efficiency of
their fins, usually based on little or no data.
But there are clear differences
in fin efficiency that can be documented by conducting hundreds of
controlled, head-to-head evaluations.
So far Scuba
Lab has performed over
3,000 such test. Here's what the data says:
So, yes, some fins are
clearly better than others; one fin technology produces better efficiency than
the other.
But it takes more than marketing claims to sort out the
differences. It takes rigorous testing and hard data.
And you're holding in your hands the only place where you can find
it.
BREATHING RATES IN PSI PER MINUTE
FIN EFFICIENCY: BY THE NUMBERS
From the hundreds of course runs, the 10 best runs for each fin were used to
evaluate efficiency and overall performance.
This graph reports three numbers
for each fin: